访谈嘉宾: James Gleick(詹姆斯·格雷克),国际知名的科普作家。1987年,他的首部作品《混沌》入围美国国家图书奖和普利策奖决赛,并成为畅销书,使得“混沌”、“蝴蝶效应”的说法家喻户晓。其后他又陆续出版了《费曼传》(1992)、《越来越快》(1999)、《牛顿传》(2003)等书。他的上一部书《信息简史》(2011)荣获英国皇家学会科普图书奖、美国笔会爱德华·威尔逊科普文学奖、英国笔会赫塞尔-蒂尔特曼奖(简体中文版荣获2014年第九届文津图书奖),并成为国际性畅销书。他的作品已被翻译成三十种语言。

在成功地为信息作传(《信息简史》)之后,詹姆斯·格雷克又一次为“时间旅行”作传!

  • 时间真的存在吗?
  • “过去”和“未来”有区别吗?
  • “未来”有没有可能早就已经既定?并不是我们认为的“充满不确定”?
  • “时间旅行”这个概念什么时候产生的?
  • 真的有“时间旅行机”吗?它长什么样?
  • ......

《时间旅行简史》通过追溯“时间旅行”这个概念的起源、它在文学和科学中的演化,以及它对我们之于时间本身理解的影响,将带领我们踏上一段极富启迪的、追寻“时间旅行”的时间之旅。

在这段旅途中,我们不仅能够遇见一众科幻作家(威尔斯、海因莱因、阿西莫夫等),还能够邂逅众多文学家(艾略特、普鲁斯特、博尔赫斯等)、科学家(爱因斯坦、哥德尔、霍金等),以及哲学家(柏格森、詹姆斯、罗素等);其中不仅有精彩的科幻故事,还有时间旅行题材的影视剧;不仅有通常意义上的时间旅行,还有通过掩埋与我们一道进入未来的时间舱,以及我们每个人都有切身体验的一种时间旅行(在阅读一本书时,通过翻前翻后实现的时间旅行)。


Interview Transcript:

See the Chinese version

Mr. Gleick was graduated from Harvard College and studied English and Linguistics. Why would you engage in science reporting and writing? In China, graduates in Arts and Science usually have significantly different interests.

The divide between arts and science is an issue in the West as well as the East. My work straddles these domains, and as far as my personal history is concerned, that may be an accident. I write about science, yet I was never trained as a scientist. That creates obvious difficulties—to begin with, I have to work extra hard even to get a basic understanding of the issues I write about.

I began writing about science as a journalist, for the New York Times, and I believe that every journalist—whether covering politics or sports or the arts or science—begins every story by asking questions. Every story is a learning process. So I tried to treat science as if it were any of those subjects: looking for what's new, what's important, what matters to people in their daily lives.

What's your idea on the relationship between art and science?

What I believe passionately is that science is a fundamental part of our culture. It isn’t separable from the arts. It is intertwined with them. You can see that throughout my Time Travelbook. We begin with H. G. Wells, a fiction writer. We continue with scientists, philosophers, writers of cheap pulp fiction for young people and the greatest literary figures of the twentieth century and beyond. They’re all breathing the same air, sharing the same ideas.

Due to the writing about complex subjects through the techniques of narrative nonfiction, Mr. Gleick has been recognized as "one of the great science writers of all time”. So, in order to explain those complex subjects, what things do you need to do in advance?

For me, the essential thing is never to think of explaining as the goal.

When I wrote about chaos theory in science, or information, or the nature of time in Time Travel, I didn’t set out to explain what those things are. I set out to tell a story. In the case of chaos, it was the story of how some original and iconoclastic scientists, leaving the beaten path, created a new branch of science and a new kind of scientific discovery. Along the way, of course, the reader (like me) will learn what chaos is, what chaos means. But the story comes first.

‍‍‍‍For fans, the latest book Time Travel seems to be very different from your earlier books. It is more an exploration of a branch of literature than a non-technical introduction to a branch of science. Do you have any reasons for such a change?

Actually I don't think it's so different, though it does appear that way at first. My subject is not just a branch of literature. The reader will discover that the book is really an exploration of time itself, and once again, there's a story, which has to do with a profound transformation in the way we, as humans, have thought about time and understood it. The protagonists include writers, but they also include scientists and philosophers and psychologists. The story begins just over a century ago and continues to the present day—because in the world of cyberspace, our sense of time is changing yet again.

Once you've also said Time Travel wasn't a real science book. What do you think it belong to ?

I hate trying to figure out what categories my books belong in.

If you were a time traveler, where would you go, the past or the future?

I asked many people that question while I was working on the book! My own answer has changed a bit. I used to think it was obvious to go to the future, even though personally I’ve written about people in the past and it might be fun to go back and meet them. (I'm thinking of Isaac Newton, for example.) These days we seem to have more and more worries about the future. Will it be a happy place?

Time Travelmakes people to rethink the concept of time. What do you think people should get after reading it?

Sometimes we look for simple answers to difficult questions. What is time? We all like to ask that, as if we could get an answer, once and for all. But it's possible to know many different things about time, all at once, and keep them together in our minds, even if some of it seems contradictory. I imagine people finishing my book and thinking, Oh! I knew more about time than I thought.


更多精彩,加入图灵访谈微信!